SEARCH:Advanced
Entire site
In

 REGIONAL NEWS

 CAMPAIGNS

 HOT TOPICS

 ASSISTANCE & AWARDS

 UPCOMING EVENTS

 IFEX MEMBERS

 ABOUT IFEX

 RELATED SITES

COMMUNIQUE:
Sign up now for your weekly bulletin of free expression news.

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

 COMMUNIQUE ARCHIVE

ALERTS:
Get Alerts delivered to your inbox. Sign up here for news as it happens.

CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE

 IFEX DIGEST

 MEMBERS ONLY

 RSS HEADLINES

Home Regional News Europe and Central Asia Europe Turkey


Update
PRINT PAGE



Thirty-nine television programmes censored in one month; European Court condemns punishment in two cases as violations of freedom of expression

Country/Topic: Turkey
Date: 05 October 2007
Source: IPS Communication Foundation (BIANET)
Person(s): Erdal Tas, Akin Birdal
Target(s): editor(s) , human rights worker(s) , television station(s)
Type(s) of violation(s): censored , legal action
Urgency: Threat

(BIANET/IFEX) - As the Press Council notes the censorship of various news programmes in the month of September 2007, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) finds fault with Turkish court rulings in the case of two citizens.

The General Secretary of the Press Council, Oktay Eksi, has reported on the state of media freedom in September 2007. Based on information from national television stations, he announced that the Radio and Television Supreme Council (RTÜK) terminated or suspended 39 programmes on 16 television channels in September.

Many of the RTÜK decisions were punishments for pre-election "misdemeanours" that the Supreme Election Council (YSK) identified. For instance, the main news programme of KanalTürk channel, and another entitled "Editor's Desk", were not suspended for nine days, beginning 11 September. Similarly, "Kanal 24" news was suspended six times as punishment for carrying what were considered to be "pro-AKP" (Justice and Development Party) broadcasts before the elections.

Eksi said that neither the YSK nor RTÜK were to blame for these anti-democratic measures, but rather that the existing laws, which obliged these bodies to act in this way, were at fault.

Meanwhile, in two separate cases, the ECHR ruled against Turkey for prior prosecutions related to freedom of speech.

In one case, the ECHR decreed that Erdal Tas, former editor of the now-closed "Yeni Gündem" newspaper, was not given a fair trial by Turkey and that his right to freedom of expression had been violated. Tas, who lives in Switzerland, had been fined several times by the Turkish government because he allegedly had published announcements made by Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) members. Turkey has now been sentenced to paying 5,000 Euros, which includes 2,000 Euros in damages, for previously punishing him on these counts. The ECHR had previously ruled against Turkey in four other cases the state had brought against Tas.

In a second case, the ECHR has also ruled that Turkey pay compensation for imprisoning human rights activist Akin Birdal. The ECHR has decreed that the punishment of Birdal, former president of the Human Rights Association (IHD) and now MP for the pro-Kurdish Democratic Society Party (DTP) in Diyarbakir, for a speech he made on World Peace Day in 1995, was a violation of his right to freedom of expression.

Birdal spoke at the United Communist Party branch in Mersin, southern Turkey, in September 1995. He said in his speech that the Constitution of 12 September [i.e. the constitution created by the military junta after the military coup in 1980] did not protect Kurdish citizens. He was sentenced to five years' imprisonment and a fine by a State Security Court in Adana in December 1998 and went to prison in 2000.

Although Birdal was finally acquitted in February 2005, he was not compensated for his time in prison, as a law concerned with compensation in such cases only came into effect in June 2005. Birdal appealed to the ECHR, quoting Article 10, which guarantees freedom of expression, and Article 6/1, which is concerned with fair trials.

The ECHR, as in several cases before, said that it was normal to "doubt the neutrality and independence" of the State Security Courts, which included military members at that time, and decreed unanimously that there had not been a fair trial.

The ECHR further evaluated Birdal's speech as a "critical look at the situation in the Southeast of Turkey" and concluded that, since the speech did not include incitement to violence, armed resistance or a revolution, the punishment for "inciting hatred and hostility" was "disproportionate for a legitimate purpose." The court decreed that there was no hate speech involved and ruled that Turkey pay Birdal a total of 7,000 Euros in compensation.

MORE INFORMATION:


For further information contact Nadire Mater at BIANET, Faikpasa Yokusu, No. 41, Antikhane, Kat: 3, D.8-9, Cukurcuma, Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkey, tel: +90 212 251 1503, fax: +90 212 251 1609, e-mail: bia@bianet.org, Internet: http://www.bianet.org

**New cases and update to IFEX alerts on the Birdal case of 29 March 2000, 03 June 1999, 31 July 1998**

OTHER RELEVANT ALERTS:


PREVIOUS ALERT(S):

- Government sends human rights leader back to prison
- Human rights leader Akin Birdal sentenced
- Imprisonment of leading Turkish activist condemned

 

IN THIS SECTION
  Albania

  Armenia

  Austria

  Azerbaijan

  Belarus

  Belgium

  Bosnia-Herzegovina

  Bulgaria

  Croatia

  Cyprus

  Czech Republic

  Denmark

  Estonia

  Finland

  France

  Georgia

  Germany

  Greece

  Hungary

  Iceland

  Ireland

  Italy

  Latvia

  Lithuania

  Luxembourg

  Macedonia

  Malta

  Moldova

  Montenegro

  Netherlands

  Norway

  Poland

  Portugal

  Romania

  Russia

  Serbia

  Serbia and Montenegro

  Slovakia

  Slovenia

  South Caucasus

  South East Europe

  Spain

  Sweden

  Switzerland

  Turkey

  Ukraine

  United Kingdom